Search for: "Sherbert v. Sherbert" Results 41 - 60 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
In Smith, in its discussion of Sherbert, the Court made clear that regulatory schemes that allow case-by-case discretion are not "generally applicable. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Windham will be on the side of reading the Free Exercise Clause as securing a strong presumption of religious exemptions from generally applicable laws (i.e., applying the Sherbert v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
First, although the court might purport to restore the pre-Smith compelling interest test, as Congress did when it reinstated the 1963 rule of Sherbert v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Entertainment Merchants Association (2011)   Module 6: Generally Applicable Laws Burdening Free Exercise Sherbert v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:19 am by Lyle Denniston
The state courts had relied on a 1963 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Sherbert v. [read post]