Search for: "Shirley and Co Inc" Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2009, 1:06 pm by @ErikJHeels
(Lynnfield, MA; William Dotolo, President) Backyard Pool Co., Inc. [read post]
14 May 2009, 8:00 am
Heinz Co., Dow Chemical Company, Covidien, Ltd. and the Conservation Fund. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 am
Federal prosecutors allege that Gallion and another lawyer, co-defendant lawyer Shirley Cunningham Jr., fraudulently took more than their contractual share of the 2001 fen-phen settlement. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Law Judge Ira Sandron issued his decision Sept. 20, 2006. *** Coastal Cargo Co., Inc. (15-CA-18215; 353 NLRB No. 86) New Orleans, LA Jan. 30, 2009. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM)   US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office is extended (Patent Docs)… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 9:00 pm
Co-hosts include: Elsie del Campo, City Council Member Rosie Mendez, Lilliam Barrios-Paoli, and Shirley Rodriquez Remeneski. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
pagename=INCN_homepage Epilepsy Epilepsy Council of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 12:43 pm
The appeals court ruling could mean the claims of hundreds of other plaintiffs would be blocked by the same time restraints, said Kevin Van Wart, an attorney for defendants General Electric Co., DuPont Co. and UNC Nuclear Inc. [read post]