Search for: "Simmons v. U.s"
Results 41 - 60
of 411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
Holder, 560 U.S. 563 (2010), and United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2006, 8:57 am
See Burnham v. [read post]
25 Jul 2006, 8:57 am
See Burnham v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
Holder, 560 U.S. 563 (2010), and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm
LEXIS 18479 (WD PA, Feb. 16, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was denied the use of his legal religious name by the religious librarian.In Simmons v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 5:47 am
In Allah v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005); and life without parole for nonhomicide crimes committed by defendants under 18, Graham v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm
Simmons, 2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:32 pm
Shawn Minihan won in State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:15 am
’s petition for certiorari to the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005); and life without parole for nonhomicide crimes committed by defendants under 18, Graham v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:28 am
LEXIS 186253 (WD NY, Oct. 29, 2018), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was no provided Ramadan meals for four consecutive days.In Simmons v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am
Solicitor General to offer views on the case of Simmons, et al., v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:09 pm
Alston et al v Read & Simmons, No. 10-15332, slip op. (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:47 am
Simmons, the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:43 am
In Simmons v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
LEXIS 155201 (ND IL, Nov. 9, 2016), an Illinois federal district court refused to dismiss an inmate's complaint that his dreadlocks and beard that he wore for religious reasons were shaved against his will.In Simmons v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 7:34 am
In Herbert v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:35 am
The court held that the complaint had not raised the 1st Amendment issue.In Simmons v. [read post]
