Search for: "Simpson v. Angel"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:25 am
The Court has heard Graham v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:39 am
Simpson (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 573, 614-615.) [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:45 pm
Sullivan and Graham present an opportunity for the Court to affirm the reasoning put forth in Roper v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
Simpson, R. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:45 pm
That skill came in handy this morning when a DVD -- the A/V portion of the presentation -- was a little late in arriving. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
Jerry practiced law in New York and Los Angeles at Simpson Thacher and Quinn Emanuel before co-founding Baker Marquart Crone & Hawxhurst LLP in LA. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:48 am
Simpson, Shareholder, Cotkins & Collins, Los Angeles His principal area of practice is insurance coverage for environmental liability and he represented the state of California in the State of California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Simpson did not hold to the contrary. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Simpson, No. 07-5193, 07-5194 Imposition of a 450-month term of imprisonment and a denial of defendant's motion to dismiss a charge of escape is affirmed over claims that: 1) the sentence was unreasonable; 2) the district court erred in denying a motion to dismiss the escape indictment for violating the Double Jeopardy Clause; and 3) procedurally barred claims. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:55 am
More on Batson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:07 pm
That's the title of a Los Angeles Times editorial today regarding Snyder v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:48 am
More on Snyder v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 7:43 am
Simpson "got away with it. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule35.3, Warden Simpson has been substituted as aparty. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:16 am
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle writes today about the Jan. 24th 7th Circuit decision in the Indiana case of Mayer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
The 6-3 ruling in California v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 10:24 am
There's an episode of The Simpsons that involves an alleged angel and an dispute between the forces of science (Lisa and Steven Jay Gould) and religion (everybody else) that winds up in court. [read post]
