Search for: "Sit v. T & M PROPERTIES" Results 41 - 60 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Heard September 11, 2020No. 20190446 Filed January 21, 2021 Third District, Salt Lake County The Honorable Todd M. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:36 pm by South Florida Lawyers
 AC Holdings is only from 2008 -- I'm not sure how strong a role stare decisis should play where the announced doctrine is merely a few years old.Maybe the Judge is just cutting the lawyer a break and doesn't want everyone to know he's a softie at heart? [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 1:58 am by Dave
  It was one of those ones where affordability is raised, but, given that one doesn’t know what the bills are going to be for the property at the outset, the reviewer and applicant make approximations. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am by Orin Kerr
A drug-sniffing dog was brought to the car, and it alerted to the front seat where Eckert had been sitting. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 1:46 pm
  Agreeing to marry someone only if he gives you money (or property) isn't exactly a great sign, IMHO. [read post]
“If you don’t get anything else out of law school, you’ll always recognize bulls—t when you see it now. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm by Jonathan Brun
 They may not have intended to harm the neighbours—I’m sure they didn’t—but they certainly intended to have the smoke stack. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:00 am by Daithí
 A key problem is that cybercrime (including academic work) focuses on different issues ie property, pornography. [read post]