Search for: "Site Leasing, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
City of Livermore (Lafferty Communities, Inc., Real Party in Interest) (2022) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am
Recognizing the year's worst in government transparency. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
The group signed a lease with St. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:53 am
She is In-house Counsel at Skeo Solutions, Inc. where she serves as a regular consultant to the Land Use Law Center. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:00 am
.; (4) Providing advice and guidance on the interpretation of the Commission’s Personnel Policies and Procedures as they relate to employees, particular incidents and organization objectives, including acting as a point of contact for employee questions and concerns; (5) Assisting the Commission’s Divisions in implementing various human resource functions including recruitment and orientation of new employees, employee development, and employee assistance; and (6) Reviewing, analyzing,… [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:47 pm
Wisconsin Judicare, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:12 am
United South & Eastern Tribes, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
” (Citing Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
In addition to undisclosed paid-for content, the site posts EU and corporate press releases, opinion articles from European lawmakers, and original material, making it impossible for readers to determine who is behind the coverage. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:00 am
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 17-13467 (11th Cir., Apr. 7, 2021). [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:00 am
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 17-13467 (11th Cir., Apr. 7, 2021). [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am
” That is because unlike the “prototypical CEQA controversy” involving a site-specific project approval, the amendment to the countywide general plan in SPAWN involved no individual project proponent that would be a necessary and indispensable real party in interest in the CEQA litigation. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
