Search for: "Slater v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
Slater, 888 F.3d 418, 426 (9th Cir. 2018) and Kelley v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:19 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court considered the case of Janus v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
That determination fails to follow United States Supreme Court or Ninth Circuit precedent. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
Vaught, 682 N.W. 2d 284 (Neb. 2004); United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:30 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:19 am
United States, 127 Fed. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
The ongoing United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr by Steve Slater. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Gerlich v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am
In the United States the situation is not much different, as an author is required under 17 USC 201 (albeit is not defined further), but the US Copyright Office has raised it as a possible future problem as far back as over 50 years ago. [read post]
