Search for: "Smart v. Jones"
Results 41 - 60
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 5:38 am
Costello is an associate resident in the Atlanta office of Jones Day. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Video Software Dealers Association and Ortiz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:16 pm
Jones (2012), in which the Court found that law enforcement use of a GPS location device to continuously track a vehicle over time was a search under the Fourth Amendment; Riley v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
Then, in Katz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:55 am
On Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog, Ashby Jones discussed the West Virginia Senate vote to offer public funding to candidates for the state supreme court in the aftermath of Caperton v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Jones sets up the question, but neither Jones nor the relevant history provides much in the way of answers.17 The Court subsequently applied Jones in Florida v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:04 am
In the midst of all this nonsense, Jones did something smart. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
The Court’s opinion is Riley v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:02 am
California, which required a warrant to search a smart phone incident to an arrest; and second, the concurrences of five Justices in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Commentary on King v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:31 am
Citation: Jones v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Making Sense of Jones by Scott Greenfield in Simple Justice Since the opinions were released yesterday morning, the blawgosphere has cranked out a ton of posts about what the Jones v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:32 am
Citation: Jones v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
See, e.g., Jones v. thedirty (“An adoption or ratification theory, however, is not only inconsistent with the material contribution standard of “development” but also abuses the concept of responsibility. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See Ontario v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Jones and Meuer argued that in the future, smart toy companies should create a higher standard of user data protection and integrate privacy values in their product design through strict regulation of company data sharing practices. [read post]
