Search for: "Smith v Cousins"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2011, 6:58 am
Smith. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 7:54 am
H was the one and only Supreme Court justice to stand up to all eight other justices in emPlessy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
Smith, No. 16-992, 2017 WL 2722472, at *3 (U.S. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The contingent beneficiary (the wife’s cousin) was represented by Jacinth Fairweather-Panton, Esq., of White Plains and Edward Smith, of Kapolei, HI. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:30 am
However, in Squires v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
Supreme Court recently recognized -- Juan Smith. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:17 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
This case (and its close cousin, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Summaries are also posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 12:44 pm
Kramer v City of New York. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:06 am
” Cousins v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
Cousins, No. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Per Blackburn-Smith v Lambeth London Borough Council [2007] EWHC 767 (Admin) and Dobbs J:” the defendant’s powers were never intended to enable it to act as an alternative welfare agency in circumstances where Parliament had determined that the claimant should be excluded from mainstream benefits;…”The High Court agreed with Barking.Section 17 (1) gives a clear indication of the purposes for which the powers in that part of the Children Act should… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Per Blackburn-Smith v Lambeth London Borough Council [2007] EWHC 767 (Admin) and Dobbs J:” the defendant’s powers were never intended to enable it to act as an alternative welfare agency in circumstances where Parliament had determined that the claimant should be excluded from mainstream benefits;…”The High Court agreed with Barking.Section 17 (1) gives a clear indication of the purposes for which the powers in that part of the Children Act should… [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm
The presence or absence of probable cause—defined as such grounds as would induce an ordinarily prudent and cautious person, under the circumstances, to believe that plaintiff had committed the crimes as held in Smith v County of Nassau—can be decided as a matter of law where the facts leading up to an arrest and inferences to be drawn therefrom are not in dispute based on Parkin v Cornell Univ. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:58 am
In Giffen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Smith, in 1920, the Court prohibited the use of direct democracy (in that case the referendum device, a close cousin of the initiative) that the people of Ohio tried to employ to undo the state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under the terms of Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 45 Cal. [read post]
