Search for: "Smith v. Department of Human Resources"
Results 41 - 60
of 216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2022, 2:45 pm
In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 10:07 am
In Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:28 am
Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Supreme Court recently struck down the CDC’s eviction moratorium in counties experiencing high levels of COVID-19 transmission. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were so large,… [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 5:43 pm
The case was particularly interesting because at least in some quarters it was viewed as the opportunity to repudiate what is left of the still controversial decision of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 5:40 pm
The case was particularly interesting because at least in some quarters it was viewed as the opportunity to repudiate what is left of the still controversial decision of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:13 am
The case was particularly interesting because at least in some quarters it was viewed as the opportunity to repudiate what is left of the still controversial decision of Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
ABC News had an article “There are two versions of the facts at Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:54 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:41 am
Continued expansion of the Virginia Human Rights Act Governor Northam signed H.B. 1848, which will take effect on July 1, 2021 and adds “disability” to the list of characteristics protected from discrimination under the Virginia Human Rights Act (VHRA). [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am
Relying on 30-year precedent set forth in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
” Congress passed the Act in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Hold the Front Page has an article “Privacy, photographs and the European Court of Human Rights“. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Obama, EFF Explains Why Metadata Matters and the Third-Party Doctrine Doesn’t (EFF) NSA Spying (EFF’s landing page re NSA spying and their use of metadata) EFF cases in relation to NSA spying and metadata in order of file date: Hepting v AT&T Jewel v NSA First Unitarian v NSA Smith v Obama Win! [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
Research and Resources Insult and Defamation through Informati [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
If you have any feedback on this episode, please email podcast@eff.org Resources NSA & FBI Stellar wind NSA Collected US Email Records in Bulk for More than Two Years Under Obama (The Guardian) NSA's Stellar Wind Program Was Almost Completely Useless, Hidden From FISA Court by NSA and FBI (Techdirt) FAQ on NSA surveillance, including FAQs about EFF’s litigation to stop the mass surveillance (EFF) Pen trap and trace authority and wiretap authority and other… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
In any event, as the Department of Health and Human Services notes, considering race in a placement decision, "on an individualized basis where special circumstances indicate that their consideration is warranted" in assessing a child’s best interests, doesn't amount to prohibited "discrimination against" families on the basis of their race. [read post]
