Search for: "Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
Smith to 15 years in prison. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
Plata, it affirmed a decision by a three-judge district court panel ordering California officials to release state prisoners ; and in General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:40 am
Smith. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:56 pm
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2011 U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Smith. [read post]
2 May 2010, 10:00 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2010 U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, according to a joint status report filed yesterday in federal court. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
The question presented is what standard the federal court should apply in considering such a claim, and in particular whether the federal court can consider evidence that was not presented to the state courts. ------- Title: Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Click Here Prosecutor on Mancuso brothers: ‘They sunk themselves:’ Paul, Steven face prison time after jury finds them guilty in asbestos case. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Smith, 2009 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Issue: Whether a federal court exercising its habeas jurisdiction, as confirmed by Boumediene v. [read post]
