Search for: "Smith v. Fee"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
Of course, such decisions can and this one is indeed going to be appealed--which is also a safe assumption with respect to an even higher-profile recent FRAND ruling by the same court, Mr Justice Marcus Smith's Optis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Press reports, including from Euractiv and Politico, claim that through this vote the Parliament endorsed the radical proposal by Europe’s largest telecoms to force some of the largest websites to pay fees to every European ISP. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
The judgment is also interesting because it is the first time the court has really focused on the question of interest on past licensing fees (interest on past licensing fees is in issue in InterDigital v Lenovo, but the question of whether it is payable and in what amount was adjourned to a later hearing). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court case, StoneRidge Investment Partners v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Perhaps the strongest case would involve statements to tax authorities falsely characterizing the payments to Michael Cohen as “legal fees,” rather than the payments’ true nature: a series of simple reimbursements for a hush money payment. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:57 am
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm
Under Duren v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
Most of the trials were technical, and Trial E is about license fees. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Smith, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 110 S. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Smith, Jr. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Ashcroft v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:17 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 2:22 pm
& Clinics, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Now it’s time to introduce Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am
The Court will decide whether sellers have an obligation to pay reasonable renumeration to an introducer in circumstances where an oral contract provides for an introduction fee payable upon the sale of a property for an amount that was less than the specified conditional amount. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
We have two partners from Oxera here, Helen Ralston-Smith and Robin Noble. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 8:28 am
The hidden asset is worth more than the attorney’s fees. [read post]
