Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, NY (Steven A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, NY (Steven A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
Skatteforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners LLP (in special administration) and others, heard 5th July 2023. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/07/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and another v Royal Bank of Scotland, heard… [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Smith and initiate 'a potentially burdensome administrative hearing' process; and that 'Colorado [has] decline[d] to disavow future enforcement proceedings against her'. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Petitioner's contentions concerning other alleged adverse employment actions are not properly before us inasmuch as the adverse action alleged in the complaint filed with SDHR is limited to the RPD's failure to issue petitioner a smaller service weapon (see generally 9 NYCRR 465.3 [c] [3]) and there is no evidence that either petitioner or the SDHR amended the complaint to expand the scope of the case (see 9 NYCRR 465.4 [a], [c]; see generally Matter of Niagara… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Petitioner's contentions concerning other alleged adverse employment actions are not properly before us inasmuch as the adverse action alleged in the complaint filed with SDHR is limited to the RPD's failure to issue petitioner a smaller service weapon (see generally 9 NYCRR 465.3 [c] [3]) and there is no evidence that either petitioner or the SDHR amended the complaint to expand the scope of the case (see 9 NYCRR 465.4 [a], [c]; see generally Matter of Niagara… [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, I am dubious about the reality of Smith’s entire web design business.Meanwhile, even if Smith will be able to generate interest for her wedding website design services from real customers, it’s hardly clear that any of them would be same-sex couples. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith will pay defendants’ legal costs in his failed defamation case, ABC reports. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/07/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and another v Royal Bank of Scotland, heard… [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
” Russell at 745, citing East Colonial Refuse Service, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
The court granted the Biden administration’s request to weigh in on a dispute dating back to the Trump administration, involving efforts by a group of Democratic members of Congress to obtain information from the General Services Administration. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:35 am
” Bowen v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 10:41 am
Impetus for Proposed Changes OCR cited the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
