Search for: "Smith v. Golden" Results 41 - 60 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2006, 9:34 pm
If the NC game  were played next week, it should feature Ohio State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Omarova, Bank Governance and Systemic Stability: The “Golden Share” Approach, 68 Ala. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am by Dan Lopez
In this episode of Antitrust Matters, Matt Cantor, Ankur Kapoor, and David Golden analyze and react to the April 24, 2023, decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal in the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The great advance of the internet has been to bring about something akin to the golden age of pamphleteering, freeing mass individual speech from the grip of the mass media. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack v… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840 [2017]; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Pasternack v… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
For an insightful take on the consequences of the eBay decision, read law professors Mark Gergen, John Golden, and Henry Smith’s The Supreme Court’s Accidental Revolution? [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201; Pasternack v Laboratory Corp. of Am. [read post]