Search for: "Smith v. Judges"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2013, 6:30 am
We sat around a modest conference table in the office of Chief Judge Smith. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:03 am
Judge Keasler filed a concurring opinion in response to this issue. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:12 pm
In this post, I wrote about then-Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s excellent opinion in the very similar case of Krimstock v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
Presiding Judge Keller concurred without an opinion along with Judge Hervey. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:09 pm
Cadet Smith’s [sic] contends that the military judge violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:11 pm
9th Rules Judge Coerced Verdict :: Smith, Jr. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:39 am
Ferguson and Lochner v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court adopted this past term in Carpenter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Judges Milan Smith, Paul Watford, and... [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 7:33 am
Jessica Smith, a member of the faculty at the School of Government of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, has given me permission to post on the blog links to her monograph, Crawford v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:56 am
Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
Following a remarkably swift turn-around, the Court of Appeal last Thursday handed down its judgment in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1260.Two patents were in issue: European Patent No. 0 777 504 (‘504) concerning “wound drainage equipment” and No. 0 853 950 (‘950), a divisional of ‘504, concerning “wound drainage canisters” designed to fit in said equipment. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
Here’s a link to the SG’s brief in opposition to the cert petition in Smith v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:33 am
Filed: March 29, 2007--Opinion by Judge Sally AdkinsIn a case arising from disputed use of a right-of-way, the Court of Special Appeals examined the nature of a nominal damages award, and whether there is a maximum limitation on the dollar amount that can be considered nominal damages.Appellants, the Browns, were determined by the lower court to have been trespassing on property owned by the Smiths, by traveling over a farm lane to access a public road from the Browns'… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:06 am
He cited to the CCA opinion in Gengnagel v. [read post]
