Search for: "Smith v. Office of the Attorney General for the State of California et al" Results 41 - 50 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
 READ BELOW FOR THE WHOLE DECISION 2011 WL 2612835Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115, restricts citation of unpublished opinions in California courts.Court of Appeal, Fifth District, California.Mark DEMUCHA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC., Defendant and Respondent.No. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am by Robert Liles
Most notably, regulations issued by the Attorney General require that for a controlled substance prescription to be lawful, it “must be issued for a legitimate medical purpose” by an individual practitioner acting in the “usua [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Copyright Office released a comprehensive study, “Copyright and the Music Marketplace” detailing the ageing music licensing framework as well as the ever-evolving needs of those who create and invest in music in the twenty-first century. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Jack, 2018 BCSC 610 where Justice Smith held that Google was not able to show that the global delisting order made against it violated its First Amendment rights in the U.S. or the core values of the U.S. or that the California order undermined the effectiveness of the Equustek order. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Haley’s novel traces his family roots back six generations to one of his African ancestors, in the process telling a compelling story of survival and resilience. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm by Mandelman
In California, for example, in the appellate court’s decision in Gomes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Unlike earlier generations, many senior citizens are retiring with large amounts of debt including a mortgage. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
The first is from the California Attorney General in Rupp v. [read post]