Search for: "Smith v. Patterson" Results 41 - 60 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10 and January 17 conferences) Patterson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Patterson, Reestablishing the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 38 Arti K. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
A claim of double jeopardy is sometimes encountered in efforts to suppress a disciplinary action in situations were the charges reflect the same acts or omissions that were the subject of counseling memoranda or performance evaluations.The courts have rejected this theory.** In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
Indeed, the ruling seems to presuppose that the pension plan was even property of the estate, which seems unlikely under the Supreme Court's 1992 Patterson v. [read post]
Indeed, the ruling seems to presuppose that the pension plan was even property of the estate, which seems unlikely under the Supreme Court's 1992 Patterson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Earl Drott
Related Blog Posts: Texas Poultry Company Enters into $27.5 Million Settlement After Crash Allegedly Caused by Employee Falling Asleep at Wheel Texas Court Remands Fraud Case Arising from 18-Wheeler Wrongful Death Lawsuit – Patterson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” No, according to the Court of Appeal's ruling in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
” Rubenstein also pointed out that in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals ruled that including charges concerning an employee's performance that were previously addressed in a counseling memorandum does not constitute double jeopardy. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10 and January 17 conferences; likely relisted after the January 24 conference)   Patterson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm by Bexis
Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A., 2009 WL 5185770 (D. [read post]