Search for: "Smith v. Providence Health & Services" Results 41 - 60 of 668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
These final regulations have not, however, reflected the significant shift in recent years in health care delivery and payment systems from a fee-for-service model to models based on improving value and quality of care provided to patients. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
In Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor [2014] UKSC 68, the Supreme Court considered the ambit of the right under s 4. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am by James Segroves
The MA organizations, in turn, contract with unaffiliated third parties to provide health care items and services to the plans’ enrollees. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicaid Services: CUTS IN MEDICAID HOME SERVICES WILL HURT LOUISIANA, SUIT SAYS, Pitts v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:33 am by Kevin LaCroix
Additionally, plaintiffs have alleged that plans are paying higher recordkeeping service fees than those paid by comparably-sized plans, despite the fact that most recordkeepers provide nearly identical services. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
Smith previews Messerschmidt v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Medical personnel already enjoyed extensive conscience clause protection, a legal right given to protect them from providing any service they do not want to provide. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  Thus, the health care law’s requirement that women be provided with reproductive healthcare services is based on neutral and verifiable facts. [read post]