Search for: "Smith v. Public Service Commission" Results 41 - 60 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
 The original harassment and privacy claim concerned a sustained campaign of online harassment, which included the creation of Twitter accounts impersonating Dr Smith and offering sexual services to the public. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Silent prayer at abortion clinics again Readers may recall the recent case of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, who was charged with four counts of failing to comply with a Public Space Protection Order in violation of a “buffer zone” around a British Pregnancy Advisory Service clinic in Kings Norton by praying silently outside it: the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to proceed with the charges. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 11 July 2023, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal over undertakings in the harassment case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer IP Reporter
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
A spokesperson for Ireland’s Data Protection Commission said Meta’s Threads, will not be launched in the EU “at this point,” Independent.ie reports. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
Here's what had to happen before her case would have been properly presented to a court for resolution: Smith would have had to actually open up a wedding website to the public; Having done so, Smith would have had to receive a request from a same-sex couple for wedding-related web design/hosting services; Having received such a request, she would have had to refuse to provide the services requested, services that she would happily… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
As it stands today, however, California businesses that are open to the public are still obligated to offer their goods and services in a non-discriminatory manner that comp [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Very few businesses take on such individualized commissions. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
IPSO 17450-23 a woman v Greenock Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 9 Reporting of crime (2021), 11 victim of sexual assault (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 10016-23 The Islamic Centre of England v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 16770-23 Abbas v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 6 Children… [read post]