Search for: "Smith v. Snyder"
Results 41 - 60
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
Corp., 289 AD2d 322; Bedassee v 3500 Snyder Ave. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Skip was also known to be a sensitive artist and a silver-smith; and in his youth, protector of younger Indians in the tribal community. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
See Snyder v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am
Ann Warren at the Post Chronicle previews Snyder v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Griffin, Snyder v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies’ (Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])” (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder v… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:49 am
We have recognized that, under the principles enunciated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:09 am
” In the York Daily Record, Jeff Frantz continues his local reporting on Snyder v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:15 am
Betts, and People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 10:40 am
Snyder, 2011 U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
” Finally in Snyder v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
Rethinking Same-Sex Marriage Law in Perry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The Dubious Data of Wisconsin v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:41 pm
Cir. 2008) (en banc) and its key predecessor Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
Snyder, 772 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2014) (consolidating cases), and won it back in the Supreme Court with the ruling in Obergefell. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies' (Matter of Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])" (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder… [read post]
