Search for: "Smith v. Strike Force, Department of Justice"
Results 41 - 60
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Willen: the courts have focused on strikes; that creates a clustering. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:02 pm
If the first argument of the week (Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Having spent my time and energy on the first seven cases, I’m going to be fairly summary for the last six; Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Hyatt, 17-1299, and Nevada Department of Wildlife v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Matthew Kahn posted the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel’s May 31 memorandum opinion on the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Justices contemplate ‘travel ban’ v. 3. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
The panel quotes De Canas v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am
Peter Margulies examined Judge Gorsuch’s misplacement of his characteristic empathy in Kerns v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
True to recent practice, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, concurred in the Williams GVR, remarking that a Louisiana procedural rule – permitting a trial court, rather than a prosecutor, to supply a race-neutral reason for striking a potential juror at Batson’s second step – conflicted with the Court’s jurisprudence. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
Surveillance and Information Gathering This week there have been more responses to Apple’s battle with the Department of Justice over whether the maker of the iPhone should write code to help the Department of Justice hack into the San Bernadino shooter’s phone. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
It’s not that the Court had departed from its usual approach in Smith. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
California Teachers Association, 14-915; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
” Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
As shown below, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which enforces Section 26820, applies the law to ban the display of any picture or physical depiction of a handgun. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
