Search for: "Smith v. Superior Court (Smith) (1981)"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Superior Court, 35 Cal. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1355 (Cal. 1996); Craft v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Meantime Sandra Sue DeLong, the victim of Kimberlin’s crime, secured a 1.61 million dollar judgment against Kimberlin in the Superior Court of Marion County, Indiana. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Superior Court, 270 Cal. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Riegel, the violation claims were dismissed on non-preemption grounds, and aren't before the Court. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
"[11] "The Court is a public institution and the public has a right to look over our shoulders and see who is seeking relief in public court. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants) People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Henderson of the Superior Court of Justice dated July 6, 2010, with reasons reported at (2010), 76 C.C.L.T. (3d) 92. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
(2) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the third degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and serious bodily injury results and is a crime of the fourth degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and bodily injury results [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
The decision of Fred Vinson, Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, to bar Federal Judges from serving as NMT judges – a decision largely motivated by a desire to avoid the kind of backlog of cases caused by Justice Jackson’s tenure at the IMT[7] – meant that NMT cases were presided over by state court judges, jurists lacking the prestige and often the competence of their federal court counterparts.[8] Congress’s dreadfully short-sighted decision to… [read post]
