Search for: "Smith v. Van Gorkom"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
In constructing this argument, Drury discusses Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:16 pm
The reality is that I suspect that little has changed since Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
Van Gorkom (duty of care and business judgment rule) Francis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (1985) in which Jay Pritzker initiated a taker-over discussion with Trans-Union’s CEO, Jerome Van Gorkom. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:12 am
In sum, the defining moment in the history of the Rule was not the famous case of Smith v Van Gorkom,[6] where the Court made absolutely clear that director liability could result from an uninformed Board decision, but the much older case of Bodell II.[7] This was the case, long before it could be said that the Rule was an abstention doctrine through its preclusion of duty of care claims, where the Rule, by precluding a fairness review of a Board decision… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:07 am
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:56 pm
Van Gorkom, which nullified a seemingly fair agreement on procedural grounds. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Van Gorkom The Perils of Small-Minority Controllers Posted by Lucian A. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Dennis Klein The financial crisis generated a great deal of litigation, much involving the directors and officers of companies affected by the crisis. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm
” 506 A.2d 173, 182 (Del. 1986). [7] Smith v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Rich and McRitchie v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
By December 2008, Newsweek reported that the size of the market amounted to US$600 trillion[v], an exponential increase when compared with the size the market had in 1993 and 2006. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Notably, it undermines cases like Tornetta v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
I. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
Aftermath of Brane v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Van Gorkom. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Their views appear to greatly differ from those of Bebchuk's, who proposes allowing shareholders to alter "rules-of-the-game" decisions or else elect a new team of directors who will.[3] This report will use Bainbridge, Blair and Stout's theories in support of an amendment seeking to expand the rule's exclusions regarding shareholder proposals to limit shareholders' input dealing with elections in general, while Bebchuk's theories will be relied upon to… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
“They definitely learned the lesson of Van Gorkom. [read post]
