Search for: "Snap-on, Inc. v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
And THAT selfie surfaced - you remember - the one of Ellen DeGeneres and assorted Hollywood Stars at the Oscars - which prompted a slew of comments here and on the IPKat - about who actually owned the copyright in the much copied image: DeGeneres for setting up the snap? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
See Apex Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
Particularly interesting is that the Federal Court of Australia went out of their way to question the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court, and say that it is exceptionally difficult to reconcile Diamond v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:44 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
On appeal, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed that the copyright claim was not strong, but nonetheless ordered Google to take down all copies of the video. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
That was the lesson of United State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
Snap-On Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
This one is on behalf of the Thomas More Society, in SNAP v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:00 am
The United States Patent Act has a similar definition. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:56 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit this week in Harney v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
Inc. was incompetent to testify about tire failures); Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., No. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
(TTABlog) Petition to cancel backfires when TTAB finds SNAP merely descriptive of syringes: Inviro Medical Devices Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
The Court distinguished the facts of Farias from a previous case, Stanley Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
