Search for: "Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 8:36 am
Until then, though, employees get to see the Labor Commissioner, even if they have arbitration agreements.The case is Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Valencia Holding Co., LLC, 201 Cal.App.4th 74 (2011)), and the question was since authoritatively answered in the negative in several opinions, including Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:04 pm
See, Sonic-Calabasas, Inc. v Moreno (October 31, 2011) No. 10-1450. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
In formulating the standard for determining whether a contract or contract term is substantively unconscionable, this court has used a variety of terms, including "unreasonably favorable" to one party (Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
In other arbitration-related news, simultaneous supplemental briefs were filed two days ago, on March 13, 2012, in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court today let stand a California Supreme Court decision that a lower court may consider whether a waiver of any state administrative wage hearing makes an arbitration agreement unconscionable and thus unenforceable, denying an auto dealer’s petition to review the case ( Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Supreme Court Opinion: Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:15 am
Justice Moreno then asked what impact AT&T might have on the California Supreme Court's decision in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm
At issue in Sonic-Calabasas, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:50 am
Supreme Court’s decision to grant, vacate and remand—or “GVR” for you SCOTUS aficionados—in Sonic Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
June 28, 2011) (quoting (Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:30 pm
Such arbitration agreements have frequently been struck down as contrary to public policy, unconscionable substantively, and/or unconscionable procedurally on account of various features of such agreements.In Sonic-Calabasas, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
(See Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:06 am
The district court rejected the plaintiffs’ assertion that the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sonic Calabasas A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:29 am
” Sonic–Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
and pointedly arguing that Gentry's sole focus was the class action waiver within the arbitration provision -- falling squarely within Concepcion, while Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
” Some indication of the high court’s view of the scope of Concepcion may be found in its recent order granting certiorari in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:42 pm
Join us back here soon for Part 2 of the legal backdrop - Italian Colors, Sonic-Calabasas and the Court of Appeal's decision in Iskanian. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:23 am
Moreno (Sonic II). [read post]
