Search for: "South Carolina v. Mitchell" Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Since 1998 he's had a seat on the County Council in Fairfield County, South Carolina. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am by Giovanni Comandé
Dear ColleaguesI hope you find useful to have the links to the new issue of OPINIO JURIS in COMPARATIONE. once again we look forward to host contribution from our Juris Diversitatis group.If you have problems to read the post, please let me know.With my bestsciaoGiovanni #ssrnholder { font-face: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; } #ssrnholder #outline{ border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: #003366; max-width: 700px; } #ssrnholder table{ max-width: 700px;} #ssrnholder… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 2:22 pm by Law Lady
Health Insurance (Rescission): MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR VERDICT UPHELD FOR BAD-FAITH RESCISSION, Mitchell v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:38 am
Frederick at South Carolina Criminal Defense Blog responds, "In South Carolina, we could begin by having voir dire. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
LEXIS 77587 (D SC, Oct. 2, 2008), a South Carolina federal district court, adopting a magistrate's recommendations, rejected complaints that Muslim inmates were allowed to pray only in common areas, and not in closed areas of the prison such as the barber shop.In Shaw v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
Mary's, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Seattle, Seton Hall, SMU, South Texas, Southern University, Southwestern, Stetson, Suffolk, Temple, Texas Wesleyan, Cooley, Thomas Jefferson, Toledo, Touro, Tulsa, Valparaiso, Wayne State, Western New England, Western State, Whittier, Widener, William Mitchell Before we do a rough assessment of the likely impact of the change in the US New formula on these schools, we offer a number of general observations. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
South Carolina (2002) -- capital defendant's due process right to inform jury of his parole ineligibilityFEC v. [read post]