Search for: "South Carolina v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:26 am
In South Carolina, subversive organizations must register with the Secretary of State within thirty days after coming into existence in the State. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
United States and Jackson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
In 2005, Husband closed a successful business in New York State and relocated to South Carolina to advance Wife’s career with United States Customs and Border Protection. [read post]
South Carolina and 20 other States ask Supreme Court to Allow Asset discovery in Argentina Bond Case
12 Apr 2014, 10:14 am
In a case involving the assets of the Republic of Argentina being subject to creditors, the State of South Carolina and 20 other states urged the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Goodale, the plaintiff was an insurance company that filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia against its insured, the insured’s son, and a woman who was injured in a golf cart accident that allegedly occurred while the insured’s son was driving under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Goodale, the plaintiff was an insurance company that filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia against its insured, the insured’s son, and a woman who was injured in a golf cart accident that allegedly occurred while the insured’s son was driving under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm
The April 12, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
It should be noted that South Carolina has not adopted the Daubert test and instead follows its own test set forth in State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
" Burgess pled guilty to a federal crack charge carrying 10-year mandatory minimum sentence, but that mandatory minimum sentence was doubled to 20 years based on a prior South Carolina misdemeanor drug conviction that carried a maximum sentence of two years. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
V. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
ComerThis case brief involves an action brought by South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster against a pharmaceutical company, captioned State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
The deputation issued the following statement:Due to the actions of General Convention, the South Carolina Deputation has concluded that we cannot continue with business as usual. [read post]
