Search for: "Specking v. Specking"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
In a brief nine-page decision today in Taylor v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
In Bourne Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Mr Speck [Counsel for Actavis], for his part submits that it is not appropriate to fix on the word intention and then embark "on a wide ranging review of how the word 'intention' or 'intended' is used in different areas of the law" when the real issue is what the mental element in the claim is. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
About two-thirds into the opening argument in Jennings v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:18 am
Speck v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:47 pm
” (4) Page 69 – V. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Judicial review should not encourage that kind of fly-specking or require that the agency produce a flawless document. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
The ability of newspapers generally and, in particular, the defendant’s publications, to summarise to the Judge’s satisfaction the burden and content of his earlier decision on 11 February 2021 in Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch), evidently irked him. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
And if our jurisprudence really requires us to ignore such sensible policy in favor of fly-specking of 19th century cases about oyster beds and speeches in the 39th Congress, then is our republic not truly ridiculous? [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm
Recently, during the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:58 am
Earth is a mere speck of dust as compared to the size and impact of the Sun.Indeed, the existence of solar cycles is undisputed, and no one doubts that these cycles affect the climate:1. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
In Novartis AG v Generics (UK) Ltd (trading as Mylan) [2012] [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:56 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:56 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
[v] The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial at 25-29. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
Other resolved complaints listed: Mr Giovanni Di Stefano v Sunday Mail (Clauses 1, 2), 04/05/2012; Mr Michael Speck v The Sunday Times (Clauses 1, 2), 04/05/2012; Peter Reynolds v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012); Jean-Pierre Bestel v Gravesend Reporter (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A man v Sunday Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Croydon Council v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1),… [read post]
