Search for: "Stack v. Jones"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am
Thompson v Hurst [2012] EWCA Civ 1752This is a rather fact specific case which shows application of the principles of Stack v Dowden and Kernott v Jones. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am
Thompson v Hurst [2012] EWCA Civ 1752This is a rather fact specific case which shows application of the principles of Stack v Dowden and Kernott v Jones. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:42 am
In particular, he referred to Stack v Dowden and Jones v Kernott, the recent authorities on the beneficial entitlement to a shared home. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:17 am
Jones v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:11 am
In this case, the court distinguished the case from Jones v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
Extra Language Renders Form Void In its recent decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm
The Jones v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:34 am
“It is only a short time ago since the House of Lords was asked to consider the issue of beneficial interests of an unmarried couple in Stack v Dowden. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
In this appeal (from [2010] EWCA Civ 578) – their Lordships were charged with revisiting the decision in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 with a view to clarifying its reasoning. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal had held the decision of the House of Lords in Stack v Dowden did not allow the court to impute to the parties an intention that they would divide their beneficial interest in their property fairly. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Imputation involves concluding what the parties would have intended, whereas inference involves concluding what they did intend. ([126])And so, Jones v Kernott [2011] UKHL 53. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
The Supreme Court has allowed the appeal in Jones v Kernott, restoring the order of the county court (i.e. that Ms Jones was entitled to a 90% share of the property). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
It was held that although under the principle recognised in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 the presumption is that when a family home was purchased in joint names they also intend to own it jointly in equity, this could be rebutted by evidence that this was not, or ceased to be, the parties’ intention. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
The refinery closed in 1984. [7] Between 1918 and 1984, Inco emitted waste products including nickel, mostly in the form of nickel oxide, into the air from the 500-foot smoke stack located on its property. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:06 pm
Jones v. [read post]
