Search for: "Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri"
Results 41 - 50
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
Compared with 1990 levels, the standard U.N. benchmark, that’s only a 3-4 percent reduction, experts calculate, a contribution far short of what scientists say is needed among industrial countries to avoid dangerous climate change. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In addition, EPA shall, no later than November 16, 2011, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice of final rulemaking setting forth EPA’s final emission standards for coal- and oil-fired EGUs pursuant to CAA section 112(d). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Omega, and Missouri Gas Energy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We discussed Fields v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Does Missouri v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Arnold & Porter, 756 A.2d 427, 435 (D.C. 2000).Private industry standardization codes - Mutual Casualty Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Such claims are not "parallel" to any recognized FDA standard. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Standard Oil of California, 332 U.S. 301, 314 (1947). [read post]
