Search for: "Stanley v. Justice Court" Results 41 - 60 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2011, 8:04 am by Zachary Spilman
I am unaware of any other recent military justice developments at the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am by tracey
Regina v Barnett; [2011] EWCA Crim 2936;  [2011] WLR (D)  385 “In relation to proceedings in which a defendant’s benefit from general criminal conduct was assessed the court was ‘entitled’ to make the assumptions provided for in section 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 even if the prosecution had not given the written preliminary notice provided for in section 71(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
This week at SCOTUS: The Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari in Ballan v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:07 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Morgan Stanley, where five African-American current and former homeowners have taken Wall Street giant Morgan Stanley to court for its role in foisting bad loans on black neighborhoods. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
Over a dissent from three justices, the court denied review in Waleski v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, No. 12-187 (pending conference on September 24) Stanley v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
After botching obscenity doctrine for more than a decade with a hodgepodge of incoherent standards and definitions, the justices finally got their act together in Stanley v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:22 am by Gillian Metzger
Dating back at least to Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2011 concurrence in Talk America v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm by The LBN Team
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority, grounded his opinion in an account of meaning he takes from an earlier case (First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
At Just Security, Marty Lederman looks at Justice Breyer’s statement respecting the Court’s denial of review in the detainee case Hussain v. [read post]
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
” Two justices—Robert Jackson and Stanley Reed—had concerns about the Supreme Court making a decision that would be better left to Congress. [read post]