Search for: "State v. Armstrong" Results 41 - 60 of 684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:48 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am by Alexandra L. Arko
Thus, based on the scan of real images, an AI program could be asked to generate an image of Neil Armstrong walking with Orville Wright in downtown Cleveland. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am by Alexandra L. Arko
Thus, based on the scan of real images, an AI program could be asked to generate an image of Neil Armstrong walking with Orville Wright in downtown Cleveland. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am by Guest Author
”   In other words, Pennsylvania Coal demonstrates why it is so important for courts to keep in mind the principle the Supreme Court articulated in Armstrong v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:56 am by Michael Oykhman
This was established in the British Colombia Supreme Court in a case known as R v Strong (see R v Strong, 2012 BCCA 279 (CanLII)). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
” The court applied the 1999 Montana case Armstrong v State of Montana and found that it “held that laws interfering with procreative and bodily autonomy are reviewed under a standard of strict scrutiny. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Jessica Rich
(In comments to a reporter last week, her staff also cited concerns about women’s privacy in light of the then-likely, now official, reversal of Roe v. [read post]