Search for: "State v. Denis"
Results 41 - 60
of 59,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
The Decision Denying intervention, Justice Ruchelsman took a narrow view of the intervention statutes, writing: “admittedly, the proposed intervenors are all pro se individuals seeking to join this derivative action. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:07 am
Marital Misconduct and Post-Separation Support This issue was one of a few legal points discussed in the appeals case of Evans v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
The publisher of the Daily Mail has “denied under oath” that it engaged in phone-hacking and other illegal newsgathering methods against Prince Harry and others. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” In addition, if more states enact fair access laws, financial institutions may be required to comply with an increasing number of fair access laws that may be inconsistent from state to state. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:18 pm
The court then denied the motion without any discussion, stating only that it did not “think the challenge was based on racial animus or bias. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
” The Court said that parties should bring forward sufficiently substantiated arguments on why the information must be protected, otherwise the request for confidentiality will be denied. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
The court rejected those arguments because it had already decided in Licavoli v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:47 am
It is styled, Bertha Salinas v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:33 pm
Judge Garcia wrote the opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:00 am
Facts – This case (Martin-Viana v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
