Search for: "State v. Hearn"
Results 41 - 60
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Before the oral arguments yesterday in The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:28 am
A 2012 Supreme Court ruling, Martinez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has flat out refused to follow the Supreme Court’s March 2012 Martinez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
LEXIS 28765 (SD TX, Feb. 21, 2018), a Texas federal district court dismissed a Native American inmate's complaint that some of his religious articles were confiscated.In Hearns v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am
Hearn’s opinion focused heavily on the holdings of six states with “strikingly similar constitutional privacy protections” applied to protect privacy in medical decisionmaking: Louisiana in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:19 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:27 pm
But its opinion in Atkins v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:13 am
In last month’s case (Felix v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:10 am
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
In Georgia, meanwhile, the state supreme court has refused to designate Hill as mentally retarded, scoffing at the mandate of Atkins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
And remember that Chief Justice Beatty, in contrast to Justices Hearn and Pleicones, agreed with Justice Toal in dissent that under South Carolina law as defined in the (2009) All Saints Waccamaw case, only an express written agreement by a parish to place its property into a trust for ECUSA's benefit could create an enforceable trust in that State. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
And remember that Chief Justice Beatty, in contrast to Justices Hearn and Pleicones, agreed with Justice Toal in dissent that under South Carolina law as defined in the (2009) All Saints Waccamaw case, only an express written agreement by a parish to place its property into a trust for ECUSA's benefit could create an enforceable trust in that State. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
LEXIS 158785 (WD NY, Nov. 16, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge allowed a Nation of Islam inmate to file an amended complaint alleging that a corrections officer prevented him from possessing his religious materials.In Hearns v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:01 am
In July, we posted the opening brief in Ladd v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
And so Hearn got double burned.As alarms go off everywhere but Texas, the Supreme Court's ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
While the unconstitutionally biased Justice Hearn agrees with him (Opinions, p. 21 [concurring "fully" in the opinion of A.J. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
While the unconstitutionally biased Justice Hearn agrees with him (Opinions, p. 21 [concurring "fully" in the opinion of A.J. [read post]
