Search for: "State v. Parcel"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,934
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 10:22 am
Ever since the nation’s first major eminent domain case – Kohl v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court, Sackett v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:13 am
Pompey Coal Company v Borough of Jessup, 2023 WL 3260534 (MD PA 5/4/2023) [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
Property, LLC v Butler County, OH, 2023 WL 3270901 (6th Cir. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:09 am
Grim v Maxatawney Township Board of Supervisors, 2023 WL 2799447 (PA Cmwlth 4/6/2023) [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Eight years ago, Breyer used his dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am
There is an exception for parcels of up to two acres in size, provided the parcels are not within five miles of any military installation and the owner has a valid U.S. visa other than a tourist visa (such as a student or investment visa). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:51 pm
The post Case Review – Bird Construction Group v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Patton State Hospital, State Compensation Insurance Fund, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
The decision in Lucas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
VanDeWalker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm
Gregory Lucas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided Sackett v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
That’s what’s at stake in a case called Patz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:33 am
Worker claims he was terminated due to age and health In Fick v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:33 am
Worker claims he was terminated due to age and health In Fick v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
In California v. [read post]