Search for: "State v. Peacock"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Ease the Burden With the Right Policy - bit.ly/wSrAFt (Marisa Peacock) Wikileaks Backers Lose Battle to Keep Twitter Data from U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
This is a curiously arbitrary list which now needs re-visiting in light of the judgment in R v Peacock. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:11 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Bender v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
The key case is Peacock v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:10 am
Cases like Peacock Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 9:48 am
Peacock argues the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle because the officer was unsure whether Peacock's license was still suspended and could not discern whether Peacock was the driver. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:56 am
Peacock, (1993) Cal.App.4th 943, 946.) [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:05 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently held in Ware v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:37 pm
(People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427 [1986]; Gordon v People, 33 NY 501 [1865]; Graves v United States, 150 US 118, 121 [1893]).Importantly, this rule applies even where a party is not required to produce any evidence or that type of evidence. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:35 am
An extended excerpt:Freddie Peacock of Rochester, New York, was convicted of rape in 1976. [read post]
