Search for: "State, Department of Public Safety v. House" Results 41 - 60 of 1,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2016, 5:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Ordinance’s ban upon the housing of offenders with violent criminal histories was in conflict with the Commonwealth’s determination that an offender is suitable for placement in the work-release facility; a determination that includes a conclusion that public safety would not be jeopardized by the offender. [read post]
12 May 2016, 1:39 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html In re M.K.T. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Riddle responded to Burka:One of the reasons you rate me as among the ten worst legislators in the state is because you claim I shifted money from incarceration diversion programs to programs that "weren't requested, such as $20 million for new cars for the Department of Public Safety. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Oklahoma's House passed HB 1056, to allow elderly prisoners who pose a low public safety risk to apply for conditional parole. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by Catriona Murdoch
As we posted earlier this week, US State department has released its 35th annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, including an in-depth analysis of human rights in the UK. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Republicans offered amendments to all three bills that would have provided that a public company need not make a disclosure unless the thing to be disclosed met the materiality standard expressed by the Supreme Court in TSC Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
Additionally, GSA was concerned about public safety and graffiti. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am by Cyberleagle
  To the extent that the duty requires hosts to monitor for illegality, that departs from the long-standing principle embodied in Article 15 of the eCommerce Directive prohibiting the imposition of general monitoring obligations. [read post]