Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Like other digital providers, it is not bound by the Communications Act of 1934, a law that requires broadcast television networks to provide politicians equal access to the airwaves. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
Padilla I (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV27561) (Crest), Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that California Corporations Code Section 301.3 (SB 826), which requires publicly listed corporations in California to have women on their boards, violates the Equal Protection Clause of California’s Constitution. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
Padilla, in which the Los Angeles County Superior Court held that California’s statute requiring women on corporate boards violates the state constitution’s equal protection clause. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Virginia Milstead
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
A California Superior Court judge has invalidated state legislation that required boards of publicly held corporations headquartered in California to include a minimum number of directors from underrepresented communities. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
And he was surely correct in understanding that the equal protection clause must mean that one race never can be superior or subordinate to another. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Superior Court judge, the Honorable Terry Green, granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment without a trial in Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]