Search for: "State Court District 1" Results 41 - 60 of 48,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2022, 4:51 pm by Stan Gibson
” But the district court also explained that [“e]xcept for Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed on plaintiffs application only on terms that the court considers proper. [read post]
The petitioners of the complaint specifically request that the Court: (1) invalidate unconstitutional New York Assembly district lines, (2) align all state and local primary election voting, including voting for state-wide offices, to occur on either August 23 or September 13, (3) If an immediate injunction is issued, immediately appoint a special master to redraw the New York State Assembly district lines. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Kent Scheidegger
  District courts generally draw their juries from adult citizens who are residents of the district. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:27 am
As explained by the district court, Balsam's response stated that it: (1) "intends to seek lost profits on the 1,662 Flip Trees that it did not sell during the 2015 Christmas season"; and (2) "intends to seek a reasonable royalty on all Inversion Trees sold by Defendants for which lost profits are not available. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 10:34 am by LaJuana Davis
The state supreme court acknowledged that the interests of Shawnee Mission School District No. 512, which wanted to eliminate a cap on the local option budget, were not adequately... [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:17 pm by Justin E. Gray
  The district court stated that "[i]t would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for someone attempting to design around claim 1 to determine what test group of users would be used to measure ease of replacement and which degree of difficulty would be sufficient to avoid infringement. [read post]
This, the Court stated, cuts against DMWW’s argument to impose liability on the districts. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
As an alternative, Russell had suggested a 25-to-1 ratio, which would result in a sentence of 60 months, the statutory mandatory minimum sentence.At sentencing, the district court had relied upon the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:31 am by Mark Zamora
On May 9, 2011 in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, some substantial guidance was obtained on two very important questions affecting the application of the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (“MSP”):   1)      Whether or not the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) can require prepayment of an MSP reimbursement claim (often times referred to as… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Wall Street Journal reports that district court judges in each of those states have blocked the bans. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm by lennyesq
Magistrate Judge | Northern District of New York | United States District Court (lennyesq.wordpress.com)   [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm by lennyesq
Magistrate Judge | Northern District of New York | United States District Court (lennyesq.wordpress.com)   [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:10 pm by Shea Denning
Superior Court and District Court Districts 3B, for example, consist of Carteret, Craven, and Pamlico Counties. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:41 am
Indianapolis, IN -The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana has released Amendments to its Local Rules of this Court are adopted, effective January 1, 2011. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 7:13 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled in favor of the Mayo Clinic and held that in determining whether an organization meets the definition of an educational organization under Code §170(b)(1)(A)(ii), the primary function test imposed by regulation is invalid.FACTS: The Mayo Clinic sought to exclude debt-financed passive income from unrelated business income by qualifying as an organization described in Code §170(b)(1)(A)(ii). [read post]
This, the Court stated, cuts against DMWW’s argument to impose liability on the districts. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:00 am by Stan Gibson and Julia Consoli-Tiensvold
District Court Determines No Personal Jurisdiction Exists Under Rules (4)(k)(1) and (4)(k)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Where Plaintiff Could Show Only a Single Infringing Unit Was Sold in the State and Defendant’s Website and Other Activities Were Not Directed at Residents of the State by Stan Gibson and Julia Consoli-Tiensvold In Miller Industries Towing Equipment Inc., v. [read post]