Search for: "State V. Osman" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  Two weeks ago, in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:19 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Beginning on Feb. 20, 2011, the United States Navy and the FBI began negotiating with the pirates to secure the release of the hostages. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:38 am by admin
Osman v Osman 2011 NY Slip Op 03564 Decided on April 26, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The supreme court held an inquest after wife defaulted in appearance for a trial on economic issues ancillary to the parties’ divorce. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am by Graeme Hall
Think of Osman v UK regarding the absolute immunity of the police; HL v UK where the doctrine of necessity was found totally lacking to ensure that a compliant incapacitated individual’s right to liberty was not violated; Pretty v UK which decided that the right to a private life included the way in which a person chooses to die; S and Marper v UK regarding the retention of personal data constituting an interference with individuals’ privacy;… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Adam Wagner
Secretary of State for the Home Department v DD (Afghanistan) [2010] EWCA Civ 1407 (10 December 2010) December 10, 2010 Asylum seeker not protected from deportation as he had carried out acts contrary to the principles of the United Nations. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm by Rosalind English
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]