Search for: "State in Interest of FW" Results 41 - 60 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 11:06 am
The mere fact that a handful of interested parties submitted information concerning the Desert bald eagles' DPS status during the comment period for the FWS's delisting proposal is not the equivalent of publishing a positive 90-day finding in the Federal Register on the specific issue of the Desert eagle's DPS status and then soliciting comment from various federal and state agencies, Tribes, and other interested parties on the particular issue of… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 8:28 am by lburchi@lawbc.com
  The court makes it clear that, if EPA makes an affirmative ESA effects determination for CTP, consultation with the FWS and/or the NMFS must follow. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:00 am by Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal
  However, the Eagle Protection Act requires that permits to take eagles or their nests must be “necessary” to protect the public from a safety hazard, and the FWS’s own regulations stress that such permits cannot be issued unless there is “no practicable alternative to nest removal that would protect the interest to be served. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 5:45 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Res. 69, a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to revoke a FWS rule that prohibits specific egregiously cruel and unsporting hunting methods on more than 76 million acres of National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm by Jessica
As happens with many young apprentices, when Curtis turned 16 he became more interested in things typical for young men his age and his interest in falconry waned. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:51 pm by Stuart Kaplow
For instance, FWS cited “a company interested in siting a wind-power facility” as an example of an entity that “may qualify for a programmatic take permit. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:02 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
We are calling out this FWS proposed rule, and the NPS rule finalized today, for exactly what they are: gifts from the Trump administration to trophy hunting interests. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
Such findings, plaintiffs contend, provide interested persons with important information that they would not otherwise be able to obtain. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:03 pm by WIMS
      The United States, representing the interests of the Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service as amicus curiae, argues that § 9 is ambiguous, that the Appeals Court must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:41 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Scientists have warned that the FWS proposal to delist wolves does not represent the best available science on wolf conservation. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 8:23 am by Simon Lester
Here, we analyse the US narrative as found in its first written submission (FWS) in the case of DS543, officially titled United States — Tariff Measures on Certain Goods from China. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
THE MEANING OF DPS AND SPR: After the tri-state murrelets were listed as threatened, and before the Five-Year Review, FWS promulgated a policy defining characteristics of “distinct population segments” for purposes of the ESA. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:13 am by Geoff Schweller
“Wolves are one of the most misunderstood and persecuted species in North America, with special interest trophy hunting and trapping groups vying to strip them of protections. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:56 am
Nevertheless, Plaintiff Schooner Harbor Ventures, Inc. filed a complaint in this court alleging that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS") had engaged in a taking, in violation of the plaintifff's Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment  rights under the United States Constitution, by requiring that the plaintiff expend money to facilitate the sale of property to the United States Department of the Navy… [read post]