Search for: "State in Interest of TB"
Results 41 - 60
of 825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
He discussed the interesting aspects of the US decision. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:33 am
And I saw something interesting: I knew that Dr. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:17 pm
In Whalen, the court found that individuals had a Fourteenth Amendment privacy interest in health information but weighed this interest against the state's interest in monitoring and enforcing the laws against misuse of Schedule II drugs. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:35 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:52 pm
Using precedent from the Ninth Circuit, the court stated that vicarious liability for the text message campaign would have existed only if Taco Bell controlled the “manner and means” of the text message campaign. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:29 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:26 am
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 5:40 am
” (United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:39 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:23 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 1:15 pm
Moreover, state and federal statutes impose significant criminal and civil penalties on persons who misuse DNA information. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
Ct. at 1465 (holding that defendant retained some privacy interest in contents of bag brought onto public bus); United States v. [read post]
