Search for: "State of Alabama v. B. T. D.; B. T. D. v. State of Alabama"
Results 41 - 60
of 244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
[B.] [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:19 pm
The first is that, if the infamous 1895 Supreme Court case, Pollock v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
A state judge and I were attempting to settle large numbers of asbestos cases. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Notable Cast: Michael B. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
Alabama, which involved a challenge to an Alabama rule requiring the disclosure of the names of the NAACP’s supporters. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am
As of 2021, the tax is no longer levied.[10] 2021 State Income Tax Rates and Brackets State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2021 Single Filer Married Filing Jointly Standard Deduction Personal Exemption State Rates Brackets Rates Brackets Single Couple Single Couple Dependent Alabama (a, b, c) 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,500 $7,500 $1,500 $3,000 $1,000 4.00% > $500 4.00% > $1,000 … [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
Johnny B. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
In Middleton v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
Damoorgian, Jonathan D. [read post]
