Search for: "State of CT Dept of Children " Results 41 - 60 of 189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05523 (2d Dept., 2019) the parties were married in July 2006 and had two minor children, Liya L. and Emery L. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 03855 (3 Dept., 2019) the Plaintiff (wife) and defendant (husband) were married in 2003 and had one child (born in 2002). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
It is designed to provide a due process of law for determining when the state, through its family court, may intervene against the wishes of a parent on behalf of a child so that his needs are properly met@ (Family Ct. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Sure enough, the Appellate Division eventually affirmed, 74 AD3d 442 [1st Dept 2010], as did the New York State Court of Appeals, 18 NY3d 846 [2011]. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05736 (1st Dept., 2018), a support proceeding, the Appellate Division held that Family Court erred in determining that the Children’s Law Center (CLC) which had been appointed as attorney for the child with no limitations on the scope of its representation did not have standing to file objections in Family Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05736 (1st Dept., 2018), a support proceeding, the Appellate Division held that Family Court erred in determining that the Children’s Law Center (CLC) which had been appointed as attorney for the child with no limitations on the scope of its representation did not have standing to file objections in Family Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"4 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]