Search for: "State of Delaware v. Allen."
Results 41 - 60
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Nelson, J.D.For the second time in a week Delaware courts have explained, in the words of former Chancellor Allen, the author of the Caremark decision, why the Caremark claim is “possibly the most difficult theory in corporation law upon which a plaintiff might hope to win a judgment. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:09 am
Posted by Ron Kaniel, University of Rochester Simon Business School, on Monday, October 2, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Asset management, Bonuses, Fund performance, Incentives, Institutional Investors, International governance, Management, Mutual funds, Pay for performance, Sweden Delaware’s Loss of Top Spot for Lawsuit Climate Posted by Ning Chiu, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, October 2,… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
, 303 U.S. 283, 289 (1938); Allen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:11 am
”[6] In rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument, the court quoted extensively from Chancellor Allen’s analysis in Mendel v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:25 pm
The key Delaware case on the Allen Charge is Collins v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:55 pm
The first of the two recent cases, Pulier v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Rather, the compelling justification concept articulated by Chancellor Allen in Blasius Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
As the Delaware Supreme Court held in Gerber v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 3:33 am
This bill is in part a reaction to the Delaware Supreme Court’s holding in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
(No. 3) [2006] QB 125, OBG Ltd v Allen [2008] 1 AC 1, McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73, Imerman v Tchenguiz [2010] EWCA Civ 908; [2011] Fam 116, the Court of Appeal observed that, leaving aside the circumstances of its “birth”, there was nothing in the nature of the claim itself to suggest that the more natural classification of it as a tort is wrong ([43]). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:20 am
The Delaware Supreme Court cited to the conflicting decisions of Allen v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The reversal of the injunction came just two days after the court heard a speedy interlocutory appeal in the case (C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:55 am
Next, the Delaware Court of Chancery rendered its opinion in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
It’s about a new Delaware Supreme Court decision – Biolase v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am
The Delaware Supreme Court, in a decision issued last week in Blaustein v Lord Baltimore Capital Corp., No. 272 [Del. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions: all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
