Search for: "State of Louisiana In The Interest of K. C."
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
The worst thing about this case isn’t that it affirms a $63 million (over $100 million with interest) verdict, so you know it’s pretty bad. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are: Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
K-12 schools. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
” With that K[alamazo]O, Christeson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
Five days left to vote for The Appellate Gourmet(c) Blog! [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:03 am
Louisiana – C. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 77 1964 (“The public-official rule protects the paramount public interest in a free flow of information to the people concerning public officials, their servants. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:10 am
Inazu, Robert K. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
The world of directors and officers liability has long been characterized by rapid change. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:54 am
It carries in-depth analyses of EU and international law, reports on recent legal developments of interest in European countries, case note comparing Union and .national decisions, and book reviews. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
See Second Restatement §402A, comments i, k. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
John Crane, the YoungerJessica K. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Martin K. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Mikitish, Douglas K. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
Arthur C. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Smith, Michigan State University; Charles K. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:42 am
Assuming you don't live in New York, Virginia, Maryland, Kentucky, South Carolina, Louisiana or Alaska, the concept of fraudulent transfer is defined by your State's enacted version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, or UFTA. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Rather, “[c]ourts must decide the applicability of comment k case-by-case, and only after taking evidence related to the various factors. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
§28-3905(k)(1). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Enlightened state-interest—a legal framework for protecting the “common interest of all mankind” from Hardinian tragedy. 36 J. [read post]
