Search for: "State of Louisiana in The Interest of J. N." Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
Courtshave long recognized that the States guard “the public interest in protectingseparation of powers by curtailing unlawful executive action. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
(lctjk1) (Entered: 11/29/2017)TEXT OF STATE OF TEXAS AMICUS MOTION Motion of the States of Texas, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas,Georgia, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and South Carolina To File Brief asAmici Curiae in Support of Defendants:The States of Texas, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia,Louisiana, Oklahoma, and South Carolina move for leave to file the attachedamici curiae brief in support of defendants.1. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Finally, “embarrass” means “to cause to experience a state of self-conscious distress. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:44 am by Orin Kerr
” 565 U.S. at 419 & n.2 (Alito, J., concurring) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
If an attorney or law firm has procured clients through marketing efforts that run afoul of the barratry statute, it would be in its interest to have the issued resolved in a private forum, and not create a public record, but does that advance the state's public policy? [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
For folks interested in the raw data, my spreadsheet is available for download here: Download LawProfessorTwitterCensus3.0Published View Census of Law Professor Twitter Users Version 3.0 Census of Law Professor Twitter Users Version 3.0 (last updated 1/22/2015) Jonathan H. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
  One of the most interesting aspects of the discussion of the history of codification of U.S. law, and its failure, is the connection between the urge to codify and the underlying rationale of the Institutes and the codified law it sought to explain. [read post]