Search for: "State of Maine v. David N. Grant"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am
BMW of North Am., LLC, 26 N.Y.3d 801, 48 N.E.3d 937, 28 N.Y.S.3d 656 (2016) (affirming exclusion of Kramer); The Little Hocking Water Ass’n v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
David Topol Margaret Thomas In its June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Case No. 1: David v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Constitution grants to Congress the power “to borrow money on the credit of the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
They grant investors rights but not obligations, while imposing upon states obligations unaccompanied by rights. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
Orrick issued an order that found that the complaint was “defective in many respects” and largely granted the defendants’ motions.[3] However, as is usual, the judge gave the artists and their legal teams “leave to amend to provide clarity regarding their theories of how each defendant separately violated their copyrights, removed or altered their copyright management information, or violated their rights of publicity and plausible facts in support. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Transportation Agency (1987)), and treat pregnant women more favorably than non-pregnant employees (California Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:59 pm
In Sims v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:03 am
Burkhard Hess: “Staatenimmunität und ius cogens im geltenden Völkerrecht: Der Internationale Gerichtshof zeigt die Grenzen auf” – the English abstract reads as follows: This article deals with the decision of the International Court of Justice in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
‘ The Tabloid Watch Blog draws our attention to David Baddiel’s tweet disputing a story in the Sun, which claimed the comedian was to take Class A drugs live on television. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Americans, whether lawyers, teachers, farmers, factory workers or fourth graders, take state equality in the Senate for granted while debating whether the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects abortion rights and prohibits affirmative action programs. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
