Search for: "State of Maine v. Dunn"
Results 41 - 60
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2016, 4:59 pm
In addition to the Title VII sexual orientation case I just posted about, the Seventh Circuit will also hear en banc arguments tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
The case I discuss below, Manuel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I focus on one such case handed down in recent weeks, Harris v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Scioto No. 11CA3447, 2012-Ohio-6291, quoting Dunn v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
United States A Haiti orphanage founder and a U.S. charity have been awarded more than $14 million combined in damages, after a Maine activist who publicised sexual abuse allegations against them was found guilty of defamation. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
To the extent that the state court based its conclusion on the IQ score of 75, the Court cited Hall v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As I explained, the main problem with the repeal effort is Article II, section 10(c) of California Constitution. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:48 am
SCOTUS Interprets SLUSA Narrowly: Rare Win for Plaintiffs Securities Bar Here's an excerpt from this Gibson Dunn memo (other memos are posted in our "Blue Sky" Practice Area): On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions: all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
This in the main has been a healthy development. [read post]
