Search for: "State of Maine v. Eugene Downs"
Results 41 - 60
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2014, 5:44 am
May the rights which the Member States lay down pursuant to Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC go so far as to enable users of the terminals to print out on paper or store on a USB stick the works made available there? [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
Engel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
You can read the brief supporting the motion, but our main constitutional arguments are these: 1. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
On February 27, 2001, the Supreme Court handed down Whitman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
This article is mostly about federal courts, because reviewing just what they do is daunting enough; but I occasionally cite relevant state cases, since many state courts seem to take an approach similar to that of the federal courts. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 7:12 am
Elrod v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
Please make sure that the Introduction quickly and clearly explains the main claims you are making. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Macadam, Suite 340 Portland, OR 97239 Phone: (503) 226-3435; (800) 448-8404 (Toll Free) Fax: (503) 226-4165 E-mail: oregon@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.orgoregon.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council Oregon Developmental Disabilities Council 540 24th Place, NE Salem, OR 97301-4517 Phone: (503) 945-9941; (800) 292-4154 (Toll Free in OR) E-mail: ODDC@aol.com Web: http://www.oddc.org Down Syndrome Northwest Down Syndrome… [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:55 am
Tenth Circuit to cyclist: Police were right to take you down … and to Tase you, bro. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
From A.M. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:05 pm
(Darron Cummings/Associated Press) An interesting federal district court opinion handed down last week in Mueller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
"[10] The Supreme Court has not been clear about how to apply this undue burden test.[11] But the economic efficiency criterion that animates Dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence suggests that the out-of-state costs of a state regulation are often justified, and that courts should balance the costs and benefits of a state regulation and strike down only those that impose costs on out-of-staters that clearly exceed the benefits they bring in-staters.[12] A… [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:34 pm
… In Barnes v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am
That’s a surprisingly complex question, and I’d like to break down the answer into two parts: the parental rights question in this post, and the religious freedom question in another post.As of 2005, about 56% of newborn American boys, and about 31% of American boys in the Western states, were circumcised. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 9:36 am
The court's main point was that, given the decision in Bruen, which came down while the appeal was pending, petitioner had a constitutionally protected right to carry, even without a showing of special need. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
Concern about child support apparently isn’t the main problem. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:11 am
May the rights which the Member States lay down pursuant to Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29/EC go so far as to enable users of the terminals to print out on paper or store on a USB stick the works made available there? [read post]
